Venezuelan resilience after the June 2026 earthquakes: what community self-management can teach us

When the earthquakes hit Venezuela on 24 June 2026, the ground shook for seconds — but the human response that followed will be remembered for much longer.

Two powerful earthquakes, reported at magnitudes 7.2 and 7.5, struck northern Venezuela within seconds of each other, causing severe damage across Caracas, La Guaira and nearby coastal communities. By 6 July, Reuters reported more than 3,500 deaths, over 16,000 injuries and nearly 18,000 people left without housing, with thousands staying in temporary shelters across Caracas and La Guaira. (Reuters)

But behind those numbers, there is another story.

It is the story of neighbours calling into the rubble so trapped people would not lose consciousness. It is the story of volunteers arriving by motorbike from Caracas, carrying water, food, medicine and tools. It is the story of families, shop owners, journalists, engineers, churches, community groups and ordinary residents doing what Venezuelans have often done in moments of crisis: organising themselves when formal systems are too slow, too overwhelmed or simply not enough.

This is not about romanticising suffering. Venezuelan resilience should never be used as an excuse for poor infrastructure, weak emergency systems or delayed institutional responses. Resilience is not a replacement for government responsibility.

But it is worth asking: what can we learn from Venezuelan community self-management?

  1. The first emergency network is often the neighbourhood

In La Guaira, El Pitazo reported that relatives, neighbours and volunteers were speaking continuously to people trapped under collapsed buildings, trying to keep them awake and emotionally connected while formal rescue capacity was stretched. In some areas, residents used whatever tools they had available to remove debris and search for survivors. (El Pitazo)

That detail stayed with me.

Sometimes community work is not a program, a policy or a funding proposal. Sometimes it is a voice saying: “We are here. Stay with us. Don’t give up.”

In emergency management language, we might call this “local response capacity”. In Venezuelan language, we might simply call it solidaridad de vecinos — neighbours showing up.

  1. Self-management is practical, not theoretical

Crónica Uno described how civil society mobilised “in motos, cars and boats” to take help to people affected by the earthquakes. In Santa Mónica, Caracas, a group of volunteer motorbike riders reportedly loaded their bikes with water, non-perishable food, medicine, medical supplies and rescue tools before travelling towards La Guaira. More than 30 riders left from one collection point, supported by neighbours, customers and local businesses. (Crónica Uno)

This is community self-management in real life.

Not a committee meeting first. Not waiting for perfect conditions. Just immediate questions:

Who has transport?
Who has fuel?
Who has tools?
Who can collect donations?
Who knows the safest route?
Who can contact families?
Who can stay behind and coordinate?

In crises, communities become logistics systems. The people who already know each other — the neighbour, the shop owner, the local leader, the WhatsApp group admin, the person with the ute, the person with the motorbike — become essential infrastructure.

  1. Lived experience can become leadership

One of the most powerful stories reported by El Pitazo was that of Elvis Boada, a young electrical engineer from Catia La Mar who lost his home in the earthquakes. Instead of remaining paralysed by grief, he joined rescue efforts in Caracas using borrowed equipment and donated clothes. (El Pitazo)

There is something deeply Venezuelan in that response: “I have lost something, but I can still help someone.”

This is not because Venezuelans are magically stronger than others. It is because many Venezuelans have had to develop survival intelligence over years of economic, political and social crisis. People have learned how to improvise, connect, share, repair, negotiate and keep moving.

That knowledge is not informal in the sense of being unimportant. It is community expertise.

  1. Hope is also a rescue tool

Another story, also reported by El Pitazo, tells of Andreina Ibarra, who was trapped for 12 hours with her 13-year-old daughter and their dog after their apartment collapsed in Catia La Mar. Her neighbours became improvised rescuers, searching for tools and working through the debris until they could get them out. (El Pitazo)

It is impossible to read these stories without feeling the weight of the tragedy. But it is also impossible to ignore the role of emotional support, faith and human connection.

In many emergencies, the technical response matters: engineering, medicine, rescue equipment, coordination, communications. But so does the emotional response.

Who sits with the elderly person who is shaking?
Who comforts the child who has lost everything?
Who organises food for the volunteers?
Who prays, translates, calls relatives overseas, or simply holds someone’s hand?

Community self-management includes care.

  1. Diaspora communities also have a role

For those of us in the Venezuelan diaspora — including here in Australia — the earthquakes raise an important question: how do we respond from afar in a way that is useful, ethical and coordinated?

The answer is not panic. The answer is organised solidarity.

Diaspora communities can help by verifying information before sharing it, supporting trusted donation channels, amplifying local civil society voices, connecting professionals, mobilising bilingual information, and advocating for transparent humanitarian support.

We can also learn something for our own multicultural communities in Australia. Disasters expose the strength — or weakness — of local networks. The time to build those networks is not after the crisis. It is now.

What Venezuelan self-management teaches us

The June 2026 earthquakes remind us that resilience is not just an individual attitude. It is a collective practice.

It looks like neighbours knowing each other’s names.
It looks like community leaders having updated contact lists.
It looks like churches, schools, businesses and volunteers knowing how to coordinate.
It looks like migrants and diaspora groups staying connected to their countries of origin while contributing skills and resources from where they are.
It looks like ordinary people becoming first responders before the official response arrives.

For Australia’s multicultural sector, there is a powerful lesson here.

Community resilience is not built by emergency plans alone. It is built through trust, language access, cultural knowledge, local leadership and the everyday habit of showing up for one another.

Venezuela’s tragedy is heartbreaking. But the response of its people also reminds us of something important: when communities are organised, connected and trusted, they can protect life, dignity and hope — even in the middle of devastation.

May the people of Venezuela receive the support, transparency and humanitarian assistance they urgently need. And may we honour their resilience not only with admiration, but with action.

Sources used include Reuters, El Pitazo, Crónica Uno, Al Jazeera, Amnesty International and Miyamoto International’s earthquake update. Amnesty also stressed that resilience must be matched by human rights-based relief, access to information, press freedom and support for local civil society organisations. (amnesty.org)

Reflection: Regional Multicultural Engagement in NSW

Multicultural engagement in New South Wales is often discussed through the lens of metropolitan Sydney, where cultural and linguistic diversity is highly visible, concentrated and supported by a wider network of specialist services, community organisations, ethnic media, bilingual workers and multicultural infrastructure. However, regional multicultural engagement in NSW tells a different story. It is smaller in scale, more personal, more relational, and often more complex because community, professional and personal boundaries are much closer.

NSW is one of Australia’s most culturally diverse states. According to Multicultural NSW, more than 2.3 million people in NSW, or 29.3% of the population, were born overseas; NSW residents come from more than 251 countries, identify with more than 310 ancestries, and speak more than 283 languages at home. (Multicultural NSW) However, this diversity is not distributed evenly across the state. Greater Sydney remains the main centre of cultural and linguistic diversity. In the 2021 Census, 38.6% of Greater Sydney’s population was born overseas, compared with 27.7% nationally. (Profile.ID) In contrast, in the Rest of NSW, 81.3% of people were born in Australia, and only 13.2% used a language other than English at home, compared with 32.4% in Greater Sydney. (Australian Bureau of Statistics)

This statistical contrast is important because it shows that multicultural engagement in regional NSW cannot simply copy metropolitan models. In Sydney, multicultural engagement often happens through established community hubs, formal networks, ethnic associations, multicultural service providers, bilingual staff, language-specific media, and larger population clusters. In regional areas, multicultural communities may be smaller, more dispersed, newer, and sometimes more visible because there are fewer people from similar backgrounds. This can create both opportunity and vulnerability.

A powerful example comes from the story of a settlement worker in Armidale, who reflected that in a small town, a worker cannot simply “switch off” from clients’ issues after hours, because that client may also be their neighbour. They may see each other at the shopping centre, church, school, community events or local services. This anecdote captures one of the key realities of regional multicultural work: engagement does not finish at the end of the working day. In regional towns, relationships are ongoing, visible and deeply interconnected.

Armidale provides a useful case study. Since 2018, more than 600 refugees from Iraq and Syria have been settled in Armidale through the Humanitarian Settlement Program. (Armidale Regional Council) Research on refugee settlement in Armidale highlights that successful settlement is not only about supporting new arrivals; it also requires mutual adaptation between newcomers and the host community. The research found that when Armidale became a new settlement location, many community members responded positively, but concerns were also present and needed to be worked through over time. This reinforces that regional settlement is not only a service delivery process. It is a whole-of-community change process.

In metropolitan areas, multicultural engagement can sometimes be organised around community segments: language groups, suburbs, faith groups, cultural associations, or service catchments. In regional areas, engagement often depends more heavily on trust, personal credibility, informal networks and the capacity of local champions. A community leader, bilingual volunteer, school staff member, church member, health worker or settlement worker may become a bridge between systems and families. This can be powerful, but it can also place a heavy emotional and professional burden on workers and community connectors.

Another important difference is access. In metropolitan Sydney, multicultural communities are more likely to have access to specialised legal, health, domestic and family violence, employment, education, settlement and language services. In regional NSW, services may be fewer, less specialised, harder to access without transport, and less experienced in working with newly arrived refugee or migrant communities. The Rest of NSW Census data also shows higher dependence on cars for travel to work, with 60.3% travelling by car as driver compared with 43.1% across NSW, which suggests that transport access can be a bigger factor in regional participation and service access. (Australian Bureau of Statistics)

The smaller scale of regional communities can also create stronger social cohesion when engagement is done well. People may know each other by name, local organisations may collaborate more directly, and community support can become very practical: helping with transport, school enrolments, English practice, employment connections, housing, food, gardening, sport or local events. However, the same closeness can create risks around confidentiality, privacy, burnout, role confusion and community pressure. For multicultural workers in regional NSW, professional boundaries must be carefully managed because they often live within the same social ecosystem as the people they support.

This is where the Armidale anecdote becomes more than a story. It illustrates the emotional labour of regional multicultural engagement. A settlement worker in a metropolitan area may finish work and return to a different suburb, a different network, or a more anonymous urban environment. In a small regional town, the worker may see the same client at the supermarket after hearing about their housing stress, trauma, family violence, visa concerns, employment struggle or mental health issue. The client is not just a “case”. They are part of the worker’s everyday community.

For this reason, regional multicultural engagement in NSW requires a place-based approach. It must recognise local demographics, local histories, Aboriginal communities, existing service capacity, local attitudes, employment opportunities, transport realities, faith communities, schools, councils and informal networks. Multicultural NSW’s Regional Engagement Program acknowledges this broader approach by engaging migrants and refugees, young people, Indigenous communities, cultural community leaders and community partners across NSW. (Multicultural NSW)

The key insight is that multicultural engagement in regional NSW is not less important because numbers are smaller. In many ways, it is more delicate. Each family, each community leader, each worker and each local organisation can have a visible impact on whether settlement succeeds. In metropolitan areas, multicultural engagement may be supported by scale. In regional areas, it is sustained by relationships.

The future of regional multicultural engagement in NSW should therefore invest not only in programs, but also in people: bilingual workers, community connectors, local champions, councils, schools, health services, faith groups and grassroots organisations. It should also provide stronger support for workforce wellbeing, supervision, cultural capability, confidentiality protocols and collaborative local planning. Regional multicultural work asks people to hold professional responsibility and community belonging at the same time. That is both its strength and its challenge.

Ultimately, regional multicultural engagement is about more than welcoming diversity. It is about building shared local futures. In regional NSW, multiculturalism is not only visible in festivals, food or language. It is visible in the everyday moments when neighbours become supporters, clients become community members, and small towns learn to expand their sense of belonging.

Copyright: ©iStock. Author Jessye Hocking

Posted inNews